EOS Rp, RF 15-35/2.8, RF 70-200/2.8. Currently I use 15-35 for landscapes/astros and 70-200 for stills and portraits. However I’m missing the kit range which is good for events and some landscapes. After reading reviews online I narrowed my choices to 28-70/f2. 24-70/f2.8 and 50/f1.2. Some apparent pros and cons for my use case: 28-70/2.0: Pros: However I do seriously recommend going for the f2.8 IS ii or iii as you gain a considerable amount of flare control which I find to be important for gigs. Also, image stabilisation is handy in poor light. I have the 70-200 f2.8 IS iii. If I could only have one body and one lens, the 70-200 would be the one.
Canon Lenses RF 70-200mm f/4 Vs f/2.8 and RF 50mm f/1.8 Vs f/1.2. On the 4th November 2020 Canon released two full frame RF mirrorless lenses for the EOS R camera system. Canon RF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM. Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM.
With the substantial price savings you get with the Sony 70-200mm f/4 over the f/2.8 version (over $1,400), you can easily buy an extra prime lens or two that will serve you much better. Which is Best For You??Canon RF 70-200mm F4 L IS USM:

Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II (Black) at Amazon for $1,698; Key features. A key attraction of choosing an f/4 zoom over an f/2.8 is that it’s likely to be more compact and lightweight. That was certainly true of the original Sony lens and the Mark II takes downsizing a step further, shaving 15 per cent off the length and 46g off the weight.

D80Jo1. 762 315 591 38 896 390 341 496

canon rf 70 200 f4 vs f2 8